Celecoxib

Formulation

The table below describes the formulation of celecoxib and the controls morphine sulfate, ketoprofen, and gabapentin for the following in vivo experiments.

Experiment(s)	Compound	Dose(s) mg/kg	Correction factor	Dose volume mL/kg	Route	Vehicle	Suspension / Solution
Pharmacokinetics	Celecoxib	3, 30	1.00	10	PO	0.5% MC	Suspension
Irwin	Celecoxib	3, 10, 30, 100	1.00	5	PO	0.5% MC	Suspension
Rotarod	Celecoxib	3, 10, 30, 100	1.00	10	PO	0.5% MC	Suspension
Plantar incision	Celecoxib	3, 10, 30	1.00	1	PO	0.5% MC	Suspension
L5/L6 SNL	Celecoxib	3, 10, 30	1.00	5	PO	0.5% MC	Suspension
MIA	Celecoxib	3, 10, 30	1.00	10	PO	0.5% MC	Suspension
Plantar incision, MIA	Morphine	6	1.33	1	SC	Saline	Solution
Plantar incision	Ketoprofen	6	1.00	1	PO	Saline	Suspension
L5/L6 SNL	Gabapentin	60	1.00	1	PO	Saline	Solution

L5/L6 SNL = L5/L6 spinal nerve ligation; MIA = monosodium iodoacetate; PO = per os; SC = subcutaneous; 0.5% MC = 0.5% methylcellulose in water

Results

Expand and Collapse accordion content

Method: Protein Binding

A table shows the results of rapid equilibrium dialysis to assess protein binding and percent recovery of celecoxib. In rat plasma, celecoxib was 99.2% bound to protein and 0.8% unbound and had a recovery of 99.9%. In rat brain homogenate, celecoxib was 96.8% bound to protein and 3.2% unbound and had a recovery of 132.5%. Acebutolol, quinidine, and warfarin were included in the study as controls and returned values consistent with literature values.

Method: Pharmacokinetics

Animals were randomly assigned to treatment groups.

Experimenters collecting samples were masked to treatment.

Celecoxib concentrations were measured in serially collected plasma samples and terminally collected brain samples (shown on two graphs) from males and females treated with 3 or 30 mg/kg celecoxib (PO) in a vehicle of 0.5% methylcellulose. There were 4 rats/group for plasma and 3-4 rats/group for brain.

Method: Pharmacokinetics

A table shows pharmacokinetics parameters calculated for celecoxib using non-compartmental analysis in male and female rats treated with celecoxib (3 or 30 mg/kg, PO, vehicle of 0.5% methylcellulose). The means for the 4 groups (males and females treated with 3 mg/kg celecoxib and males and females treated with 30 mg/kg celecoxib, respectively) are as follows. The highest concentration (Cmax) was 0.62, 0.79, 3.6, and 5.97 µM; the time at the maximum concentration (Tmax) was 3.5, 4.5, 5, and 3.33 hours; the half-life (T1/2) was 5.03, 8.52, 4.82, and 12.54 hours; area under the curve for time 0 to 24 hours was 317, 545, 2581, and 4784 minutes*µM; area under the curve for time 0 to infinity was 330, 566, 2624, and 7264 minutes*µM; the brain-to-plasma ratio at 4 hours was 1.54, 1.17, 2.53, and 1.9; the brain-to-plasma ratio at 24 hours was 1.53, 2.17, 2.06, and 1.58

Method: Modified Irwin functional observational battery

Animals were balanced across treatment groups based on body weight.

Experimenters assessing behavior were masked to treatment.

Group size was determined using power analysis.

Two reviewers observed and scored 39 behaviors in a modified Irwin test. For each animal, the scores for behavioral observations from each reviewer are summed then averaged for male and female rats (shown on two graphs). Responses are shown at the following time points: baseline (before treatment) and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after treatment with vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose, delivered PO) or celecoxib (3, 10, 30, or 100 mg/kg, delivered PO). There were 4 rats per group. Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed at each timepoint for each sex, and no significant effects were found. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 10.0.2

Method: Modified Irwin functional observational battery

A heat map depicts the severity of the behaviors observed by two reviewers in a modified Irwin test at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours following the administration of vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose, delivered PO) or celecoxib (3, 10, 30, or 100 mg/kg, delivered PO). There were 8 rats per group (4 male and 4 female). Severity score was calculated as the sum of scores given by the two reviewers for all animals at that dose and timepoint divided by the maximum possible score, transformed into a percentage. In summary, celecoxib administration was well tolerated

Method: Modified Irwin functional observational battery

Two graphs show the body temperature of male or female rats during the modified Irwin test. Responses are shown at the following timepoints: baseline (before treatment) and at 1 and 6 hours after treatment with vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose, delivered PO) or celecoxib (3, 10, 30, or 100 mg/kg, delivered PO). There were 4 rats per group. A significant effect of time was found in a two-way repeated measures ANOVA for each sex. Dunnett’s tests found a significant decrease in body temperature in males relative to baseline at 6 hours post-treatment (p<0.001). Dunnett’s tests found a significant decrease in body temperature in females relative to baseline at 1 hours post-treatment (p<0.05) and at 6 hours post-treatment (p<0.01). Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 10.0.2

Method: Rat Rotarod

Animals that achieved a latency of 40 seconds during the baseline trial were included in the study.

Two graphs show the latency for male or female rats to fall off a rotarod apparatus. Responses are shown at the following time points: baseline (before treatment) and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after treatment with vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose, delivered PO) or celecoxib (3, 10, 30, or 100 mg/kg, delivered PO). There were 10 rats per group. Neither males nor females had a significant interaction of time x treatment in a two-way repeated measures ANOVA.

Model: Plantar Incision Model in Rat (Brennan Model)

Animals were balanced across treatment groups based on body weight and post-surgery withdrawal thresholds.

Animals with ipsilateral post-surgery withdrawal thresholds ≤3.0g were included in the study.

Endpoint: Rat Hind Paw Mechanical Allodynia Behavior (von Frey Filaments) Method

Two graphs show ipsilateral hind paw mechanical allodynia behavior assessed with von Frey filaments in male or female rats that have undergone plantar incision surgery. Responses are shown at the following time points: baseline (before surgery), prior to treatment at 1 day after surgery, and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after treatment at 1 day after surgery. The treatments are vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose, delivered PO), celecoxib (3, 10, or 30 mg/kg, delivered PO), morphine (6 mg/kg, delivered SC), or ketoprofen (6 mg/kg, delivered PO). There were 10 rats per group. A significant interaction of time x treatment was found in a two-way repeated measures ANOVA for each sex. Dunnett’s tests found significant increases in withdrawal thresholds relative to vehicle in males at 1 hour post-treatment with 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.01) and morphine (p<0.0001); at 2 hours post-treatment with 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05) and morphine (p<0.0001); and at 4 hours post-treatment with morphine (p<0.0001). Dunnett’s tests found significant increases in withdrawal thresholds relative to vehicle in males at 1 hour post-treatment with 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05) and morphine (p<0.0001); at 2 hours post-treatment with morphine (p<0.0001); at 4 hours post-treatment with morphine (p<0.0001); and at 6 hours post-treatment with morphine (p<0.01).

Model: Plantar Incision Model in Rat (Brennan Model)

Animals were balanced across treatment groups based on body weight and post-surgery guarding scores.

Animals with ipsilateral post-surgery guarding scores ≥10 were included in the study.

Endpoint: Guarding Behavior

Two graphs show ipsilateral hind paw guarding behavior evaluated in male or female rats that have undergone plantar incision surgery. Responses are shown at the following time points: baseline (before surgery), prior to treatment at 1 day after surgery, and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after treatment at 1 day after surgery. The treatments are vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose, delivered PO), celecoxib (3, 10, or 30 mg/kg, delivered PO), morphine (6 mg/kg, delivered SC), or ketoprofen (6 mg/kg, delivered PO). There were 10 rats per group. A significant interaction of time x treatment was found in a two-way repeated measures ANOVA for each sex. Dunnett’s tests found significant decreases in guarding scores relative to vehicle in males at 1 hour post-treatment with 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.01), morphine (p<0.0001), and ketoprofen (p<0.001); at 2 hours post-treatment with 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.01), morphine (p<0.0001), and ketoprofen (p<0.01); at 4 hours post-treatment with 10 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05), 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.01), and ketoprofen (p<0.01); and at 6 hours post-treatment with 10 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05), 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.01), and ketoprofen (p<0.01). Dunnett’s tests found significant decreases in guarding scores relative to vehicle in females at 1 hour post-treatment with 3 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.001), 10 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.01), 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05), morphine (p<0.001), and ketoprofen (p<0.01); at 2 hours post-treatment with 3 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.001), 10 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05), 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.01), morphine (p<0.01), and ketoprofen (p<0.05); at 4 hours post-treatment with 3 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05), 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05), and ketoprofen (p<0.05); and at 6 hours post-treatment with 3 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.0001), 10 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05), 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05), and ketoprofen (p<0.001).

Model: L5/L6 Spinal Nerve Ligation Model

Endpoint: Rat Hind Paw Mechanical Allodynia Behavior (von Frey Filaments) Method

Model: L5/L6 Spinal Nerve Ligation Model

Animals were balanced across treatment groups based on body weight and post-surgery positive responses to acetone trials.

Animals with ipsilateral post-surgery number of positive responses to acetone trials ≥2 were included in the study.

Endpoint: Rat Hind Paw Cold Allodynia (Acetone Evaporation) Test

Two graphs show ipsilateral hind paw cold allodynia behavior assessed with 5 trials of the acetone evaporation test in male or female rats that have undergone L5/L6 spinal nerve ligation surgery. Responses are shown at the following time points: baseline (before surgery), prior to treatment at 3 weeks after surgery, and at 1 and 3 hours after treatment at 3 weeks after surgery. The treatments are vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose, delivered PO), celecoxib (3, 10, or 30 mg/kg, delivered PO), or the positive control gabapentin (60 mg/kg, delivered PO). There were 10 rats per group. A significant interaction of time x treatment was found in a two-way repeated measures ANOVA for each sex. Dunnett’s tests found significant decreases in acetone responses relative to vehicle in males at 3 hours post-treatment with gabapentin (p<0.01). Dunnett’s tests found significant decreases in acetone responses relative to vehicle in females at 1 hour post-treatment with gabapentin (p<0.0001) and at 3 hours post-treatment with gabapentin (p<0.01).

Method: Monosodium Iodoacetate (MIA) Model

Animals were balanced across treatment groups based on body weight and post-induction withdrawal thresholds.

Animals with ipsilateral pre-induction withdrawal responses >8.0g and post-induction withdrawal thresholds ≤4.0g were included in the study.

Endpoint: Rat Hind Paw Mechanical Allodynia Behavior (von Frey Filaments) Method

Method: Monosodium Iodoacetate (MIA) Model

Endpoint: Rat Hind Paw Mechanical Allodynia Behavior (von Frey Filaments) Method

Method: Monosodium Iodoacetate (MIA) Model

Animals were balanced across treatment groups based on body weight and post-induction weight bearing.

Animals with ipsilateral post-induction weight bearing of 10-40% of total hind paw weight bearing were included in the study.

Endpoint: Dynamic Weight Bearing Measurement Method

Two graphs show ipsilateral hind paw dynamic weight bearing behavior in male or female rats that have undergone injection of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA, 3 mg/50 µL) in the left hind limb knee joint. Responses are shown at the following time points: baseline (before MIA injection), Day 4 after MIA injection, and at 1 hour after treatment on Day 5. The treatments are vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose, delivered PO), celecoxib (3, 10, or 30 mg/kg, delivered PO), or the positive control morphine (6 mg/kg, delivered SC). There were 9-10 rats per group for males and 8-10 rats per group for females. A significant interaction of time x treatment was found in a two-way repeated measures ANOVA for each sex. Dunnett’s tests found significant increases in hind paw dynamic weight bearing relative to vehicle in males at 1 hour post-treatment with morphine (p<0.05). Dunnett’s tests found significant increases in hind paw dynamic weight bearing relative to vehicle in females at 1 hour post-treatment with 10 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05), 30 mg/kg celecoxib (p<0.05), and morphine (p<0.01).

Method: Monosodium Iodoacetate (MIA) Model

Endpoint: Dynamic Weight Bearing Measurement Method

This work was conducted by PsychoGenics Inc. (Paramus, NJ) in collaboration with PSPP, NINDS, NIH under contract # 75N95019D00026. Prescribing information for clinically used controls can be found at labels.fda.gov. Information for icons representing experimental design details can be found through the NINDS Office of Research Quality https://go.nih.gov/Yw2tHGI.

Celecoxib

Formulation

Results

Protein Binding

Pharmacokinetics: Concentration in Plasma and Brain

Pharmacokinetics: Calculated Parameters

Irwin: Total Observations

Irwin: Behavioral Severity Scores

Irwin: Body Temperature

Rotarod

Plantar Incision: von Frey

Plantar Incision: Guarding Behavior

L5/L6 Spinal Nerve Ligation: von Frey

L5/L6 Spinal Nerve Ligation: Acetone

Monosodium Iodoacetate (MIA): von Frey (Single Administration)

Monosodium Iodoacetate (MIA): von Frey (Repeated Administration)

Monosodium Iodoacetate (MIA): Dynamic Weight Bearing (Single Administration)

Monosodium Iodoacetate (MIA): Dynamic Weight Bearing (Repeated Administration)